From seanegan at gmail.com  Tue Mar 23 15:52:36 2010
From: seanegan at gmail.com (Sean Egan)
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:52:36 -0700
Subject: Invoice from CT Corp
Message-ID: <e61d333f1003231252t2e6a11fag1e0b515e1d3a8422@mail.gmail.com>

Hi board,

We're represented in Delaware by CT Corp http://ct.wolterskluwer.com/
who has sent us (through the SFLC) an invoice for $358 for 2009.
Ethan, do you want to take care of this (I'll forward you the
invoice), or should I?

$358/yr seems a bit expensive for what we use them for, so I'd like to
shop around a little for a better deal, if there are no objections.


From lschiere at pidgin.im  Wed Mar 24 18:36:57 2010
From: lschiere at pidgin.im (Luke Schierer)
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:36:57 -0400
Subject: Invoice from CT Corp
In-Reply-To: <e61d333f1003231252t2e6a11fag1e0b515e1d3a8422@mail.gmail.com>
References: <e61d333f1003231252t2e6a11fag1e0b515e1d3a8422@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20100324223657.GA28238@rock.pidgin.im>

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:52:36PM -0700, Sean Egan wrote:
> Hi board,
> 
> We're represented in Delaware by CT Corp http://ct.wolterskluwer.com/
> who has sent us (through the SFLC) an invoice for $358 for 2009.
> Ethan, do you want to take care of this (I'll forward you the
> invoice), or should I?
> 
> $358/yr seems a bit expensive for what we use them for, so I'd like to
> shop around a little for a better deal, if there are no objections.

If you can find something better, you can present it via email resolution.

No harm in shopping around.

Luke


